ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ff-pdp-may08]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] WG member comments

  • To: "Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] WG member comments
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:02:22 -0400


You bring up a good point Paul, are so-called constituency statements, or those "co-signed" by persons of no known views, real?

Diaz, Paul wrote:
As we continue to address the fast-flux issue, it's probably worth
reiterating that any comments made here are only the views of the
Working Group member.  They should not automatically be interpreted as
the position(s) of the respective constituency.  Unlike an ICANN Task
Force where participants are elected to represent their constituency,
members of a WG are all volunteers and are not automatically empowered
to speak on their constituency's behalf.  Of course, any deliberate
constituency statement should be duly noted.






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy