Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] WG member comments

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You bring up a good point Paul, are so-called constituency statements, 
or those "co-signed" by persons of no known views, real?
Diaz, Paul wrote:
> As we continue to address the fast-flux issue, it's probably worth
> reiterating that any comments made here are only the views of the
> Working Group member.  They should not automatically be interpreted as
> the position(s) of the respective constituency.  Unlike an ICANN Task
> Force where participants are elected to represent their constituency,
> members of a WG are all volunteers and are not automatically empowered
> to speak on their constituency's behalf.  Of course, any deliberate
> constituency statement should be duly noted.
>
>
>
>