<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Registrant Verification: additional language for 5.7
- To: George Kirikos <fastflux@xxxxxxxx>, Fast Flux Workgroup <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Registrant Verification: additional language for 5.7
- From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:59:56 -0700
HI George,
This is an important point. Perhaps you might say "additional" rather than
"stronger" and amplify by giving an example or two of the kinds of
verification procedures the GNSO should consider?
On 10/27/08 4:49 PM Oct 27, 2008, "George Kirikos" <fastflux@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In 5.7 of the document, for "active engagement" ideas (starting at
> line 926), I'd propose adding the following point, say between line
> 930 and line 931 of the current document or at line 947:
>
> - stronger registrant verification procedures
>
> Note, this can be accomplished without affecting the display of public
> WHOIS (i.e. verification takes place by registrar or registry, but
> WHOIS display is unaffected, in particular they can continue to use
> privacy services).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> www.LEAP.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|