Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Possible additional registries to mention for page 37 footnote

[Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>]

Doesn't this depend on your metric for under control?

The APWG Annual Phishing 1H2008 metric would suggest that several others
that have abuse under control if you consider that metric as valuable.

That report also makes some useful observations regarding the
characteristics that those registries share. Using the APWG scoring, you
could add all the TLDs that had a score of less than 1, for example, AG, AR,
DE, DM, EU, .. Don't overlook Libya with a "attaboy" score of 0.0  :-)

The EU score is noteworthy because it's a sizeable registry.

You could also use "phishing uptime". COOP, Jersey, Caymans, Kazakhstan,
Nicaragua are all around 4-5 hours.

Perhaps a combination of scores... Aren't numbers fun?

On 12/19/08 11:45 AM  Dec 19, 2008, "Joe St Sauver" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>
> So after thinking a bit about TLDs that have abuse issues under control,
> the ones that come to mind include:
>
> -- .gov, .mil, .edu, .int
>
> -- .us, .uk (and many other ccTLDs, although there certainly are some
>       noteworthy exceptions)
>
> I'd be happy to hear suggestions from others, however.
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe