Re: [gnso-frn-dt] i had a go at a revised draft of the report

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hm.

the silence is "great job mikey"?  i'm thinking it would be nice to get this 
little one cleared off the plate fairly quickly -- Marika, what happens to a 
revised draft once we give it the nod?

mikey


On Jun 16, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> hi all,
> 
> 'seemed like scheduling and logistics got Too Hard.  it also seemed like the 
> comments were pretty easy to accommodate.  so i just went ahead and cranked 
> out a new draft.
> 
> it's unchanged until we get down to the "options" part at the end.  there, i 
> added one to add this to an upcoming WHOIS PDP with a "worthy of broader 
> discussion by the Council but not our preferred approach" pretty much in line 
> with our view on adding it to a PDP on the RAA.  i also refined the "launch a 
> PDP on FRN" one that we had at the end based on the ALAC comments -- there, i 
> made the "narrow" point more clear, added some benefits and bumped it up to 
> that same "worthy of broader discussion but not our preferred approach" 
> status.
> 
> so take a look at this draft and see what you think.  the substantive change 
> is to agree on what our views are about those two additions, i think.
> 
> mikey
> 
> <FRN Rp1 - wComments v1 - 16 June 2012.doc>
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)