Re: [gnso-frn-dt] i had a go at a revised draft of the report
- To: gnso-frn-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-frn-dt] i had a go at a revised draft of the report
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:23:57 -0500
the silence is "great job mikey"? i'm thinking it would be nice to get this
little one cleared off the plate fairly quickly -- Marika, what happens to a
revised draft once we give it the nod?
On Jun 16, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> hi all,
> 'seemed like scheduling and logistics got Too Hard. it also seemed like the
> comments were pretty easy to accommodate. so i just went ahead and cranked
> out a new draft.
> it's unchanged until we get down to the "options" part at the end. there, i
> added one to add this to an upcoming WHOIS PDP with a "worthy of broader
> discussion by the Council but not our preferred approach" pretty much in line
> with our view on adding it to a PDP on the RAA. i also refined the "launch a
> PDP on FRN" one that we had at the end based on the ALAC comments -- there, i
> made the "narrow" point more clear, added some benefits and bumped it up to
> that same "worthy of broader discussion but not our preferred approach"
> so take a look at this draft and see what you think. the substantive change
> is to agree on what our views are about those two additions, i think.
> <FRN Rp1 - wComments v1 - 16 June 2012.doc>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)