<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-idealprocess-st] FW: Ideal Process Call - next steps & next call
- To: "gnso-idealprocess-st@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-idealprocess-st@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-idealprocess-st] FW: Ideal Process Call - next steps & next call
- From: "Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:32:34 +0000
Just saw that the mailing list wasn't copied (and I had Michele's email bounce)
- resending to keep this documented & to hopefully also reach Michele...
Simonetta
From: Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:58 AM
To: 'Mike O'Connor'; Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: James M. Bladel; Marika Konings
Subject: RE: Ideal Process Call - next steps & next call
Hi Everyone,
@Mikey: thank you so much for taking notes again today! I'm looking forward to
presenting this to the larger group for their input. Feels like it was a great
idea to start with the principles, because it helped us identify a lot of the
items we needed to take into consideration when coming up with this first draft.
I'd like to introduce this first draft for feedback from the larger workgroup
on Tuesday and then gather again to tweak what we have so far.
I've set up a Doodle for potential times next week:
http://www.doodle.com/n89hvbram38w6vgn
Next steps:
- Finalize review of principles with larger workgroup
- Present first version of the process to the group and request
feedback
- Tweak process draft, then include both pieces in our initial draft
report
- Ask for further feedback & comments from the workgroup (and if
needed tweak further) until we're happy (and/or have identified the open items
we need further feedback from the community on)
I'm wondering if we can use the regional ICANN meeting in May in LA to also get
some feedback from registrars/registries there?
What would be the process to get on their agenda? Is anybody from this subteam
or the larger workgroup going to be at that meeting?
And do you even think that's a good idea (or do you think it is too early of a
draft to share at this point?)
Simonetta
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:07 AM
To: Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Neylon:@
Cc: James M. Bladel; Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger; Marika Konings
Subject: Re: Ideal Process Call
hi all,
Simonetta, Marika and i bashed out a first-draft ideal process and only butted
heads once or twice. not too bad! :-)
here's a PDF of the relevant bit of the mind map for you to review. we kinda
ran out of time, so there are some rough edges but we feel like we made a
pretty good go of it.
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neylon:@" <Blacknight michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Ideal Process Call
- From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:07:09 +0000
hi all,
Simonetta, Marika and i bashed out a first-draft ideal process and only butted
heads once or twice. not too bad! :-)
here's a PDF of the relevant bit of the mind map for you to review. we kinda
ran out of time, so there are some rough edges but we feel like we made a
pretty good go of it.
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
Attachment:
IRTP -- Ideal Process v4.pdf
Description: IRTP -- Ideal Process v4.pdf
--- End Message ---
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|