ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idealprocess-st]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-idealprocess-st] FW: Ideal Process Call - next steps & next call

  • To: "gnso-idealprocess-st@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-idealprocess-st@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-idealprocess-st] FW: Ideal Process Call - next steps & next call
  • From: "Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:32:34 +0000

Just saw that the mailing list wasn't copied (and I had Michele's email bounce) 
- resending to keep this documented & to hopefully also reach Michele...
Simonetta

From: Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:58 AM
To: 'Mike O'Connor'; Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: James M. Bladel; Marika Konings
Subject: RE: Ideal Process Call - next steps & next call

Hi Everyone,

@Mikey: thank you so much for taking notes again today! I'm looking forward to 
presenting this to the larger group for their input. Feels like it was a great 
idea to start with the principles, because it helped us identify a lot of the 
items we needed to take into consideration when coming up with this first draft.

I'd like to introduce this first draft for feedback from the larger workgroup 
on Tuesday and then gather again to tweak what we have so far.

I've set up a Doodle for potential times next week:

http://www.doodle.com/n89hvbram38w6vgn

Next steps:

-          Finalize review of principles with larger workgroup

-          Present first version of the process to the group and request 
feedback

-          Tweak process draft, then include both  pieces in our initial draft 
report

-          Ask for further feedback & comments from the workgroup (and if 
needed tweak further) until we're happy (and/or have identified the open items 
we need further feedback from the community on)

I'm wondering if we can use the regional ICANN meeting in May in LA to also get 
some feedback from registrars/registries there?
What would be the process to get on their agenda? Is anybody from this subteam 
or the larger workgroup going to be at that meeting?
And do you even think that's a good idea (or do you think it is too early of a 
draft to share at this point?)

Simonetta

From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:07 AM
To: Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Neylon:@
Cc: James M. Bladel; Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger; Marika Konings
Subject: Re: Ideal Process Call

hi all,

Simonetta, Marika and i bashed out a first-draft ideal process and only butted 
heads once or twice.  not too bad!  :-)

here's a PDF of the relevant bit of the mind map for you to review.  we kinda 
ran out of time, so there are some rough edges but we feel like we made a 
pretty good go of it.

mikey

- - - - - - - - -
phone    651-647-6109
fax              866-280-2356
web      http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
--- Begin Message ---
  • To: "Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neylon:@" <Blacknight michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Ideal Process Call
  • From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:07:09 +0000
hi all,

Simonetta, Marika and i bashed out a first-draft ideal process and only butted 
heads once or twice.  not too bad!  :-)

here's a PDF of the relevant bit of the mind map for you to review.  we kinda 
ran out of time, so there are some rough edges but we feel like we made a 
pretty good go of it.

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone    651-647-6109
fax              866-280-2356
web      http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

Attachment: IRTP -- Ideal Process v4.pdf
Description: IRTP -- Ideal Process v4.pdf


--- End Message ---


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy