ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idn-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-idn-wg] Item 4.2.2 - Subbiah

  • To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx, "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Item 4.2.2 - Subbiah
  • From: subbiah <subbiah@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:16:18 -0800

Item 4.2.2


Given that alternative views have been expressed for the possible right’s of a country regarding IDN gTLDs in that country’s scripts, I would like to propose that some of these rights should also be given to the language community. The two areas where language community input would be particularly useful maybe the “approval” of a gTLD IDN string in its script and also its rights to influence the definitions/tables of its scripts/languages. Obviously such language communities must speak with a united or near-unanimous voice before ICANN accepts input.


There are two ways to accomplish this operationally:

(1) Amend the first two alternative views to replace the word “country” with “language community” and specifically define “language community” in this context to include the relevant country/countries.

Or simply add a new alternative view (which can be at Support level if there is some support) as follows:

*(2) Alternative View/ Support/ Agreement: To also accept a language community’s responsibility to approve any gTLD strings featuring its particular script or influence the definitions/tables of its scripts if that language community is speaking with a united or near-unanimous voice.

Subbiah


-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.12/724 - Release Date: 3/16/2007




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy