<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Draft Outcomes Report - cont'd discussion on statement in 4.5.1
- To: "Dr Tan Tin Wee" <tinwee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Draft Outcomes Report - cont'd discussion on statement in 4.5.1
- From: "Alexei Sozonov" <sozon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:33:41 -0800
Regarding 4.5.1...
From the Cyrillic/Russian community we support Tin Wee here...
Alexei Sozonov
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr Tan Tin Wee" <tinwee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Draft Outcomes Report - cont'd discussion on
statement in 4.5.1
"2. An IDN gTLD registry should limit the degree of script mixing and
have a
limit for the number of scripts allowed for its domain names. Such
limits,
with justifications, should be proposed by the IDN gTLD applicant and be
evaluated for reasonableness."
Excellent draft. Can we also include
"... evaluated for reasonableness and in the context of the language(s)
involved."?
bestrgds
tin wee
---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:35:40 +0100
Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Draft Outcomes Report - cont'd discussion on
statement in 4.5.1
Dear all,
As agreed during the IDN WG call today, I start a thread to further
elaborate on the statement in item 2 under "Other considerations..." at
the
end of 4.5.1
The starting point was the phrasing in the 14 March draft:
"2. There should be an overall limit, i.e. no more than <x> number of
languages/scripts in an IDN gTLD. The method for determining such a limit
remains to be defined."
Comments stated that the limit shouldn't necessarily be the same for all,
that the applicant should provide input for any limit, that the applicant
should declare how to limit the degree of script mixing, and more...
Maybe, just maybe, the following drafting could better capture the views:
"2. An IDN gTLD registry should limit the degree of script mixing and
have a
limit for the number of scripts allowed for its domain names. Such
limits,
with justifications, should be proposed by the IDN gTLD applicant and be
evaluated for reasonableness."
Now, over to you all for improvements or alternatives.
Best regards
Olof
------- End of Original Message -------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|