<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Asciish
- To: "'Cary Karp'" <ck@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Asciish
- From: "olof nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:39:20 +0100
Cary and all,
According to Wikipedia (perhaps not a "linguistic source", but anyway) it is
indeed neither: " ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange),
generally pronounced [ËÃski], is a character encoding based on the English
alphabet. ASCII codes represent text in computers, communications equipment,
and other devices that work with text."
More on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascii and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_%28disambiguation%29
Best regards
Olof
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Cary Karp
Sent: den 19 mars 2007 20:04
To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Asciish
Quoting Tin Wee:
> ... no IDN string in a given language should be assumed to have any
> meaning or other connection with another string in another language,
> ASCII included.
The w.g. discussion has been peppered with references to ASCII as both
a language and a script. I have always been of the belief that it
is neither. Can someone please provide a few references to linguistic
sources that provide warrant for this usage.
/Cary
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|