<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.3 elevation to Agreeement...
- To: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.3 elevation to Agreeement...
- From: "Tan, William" <William.Tan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:44:00 -0400
I second that. Not sure how that translate to the new document / BCP
that ICANN is planning to move towards though.
Perhaps Tina can weigh in on that.
=wil
Ram Mohan wrote:
I recommend we move 4.3.3 to Agreement, especially since all new
registries are going to be contractually required to comply with the
ICANN IDN Guidelines anyway.
*4.3.3 (OLD)*
*Support* for pursuing compliance with ICANN IDN Guidelines.
Note: The New gTLD Recommendations foresee compliance with ICANN IDN
Guidelines as a standard contractual condition.
--
*4.3.3 (SUGGESTED NEW)*
Agreement that all new IDN gTLD applicants must comply with ICANN IDN
Guidelines.
-Ram
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|