ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idn-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Addition to Section 4.2.1

  • To: "subbiah" <subbiah@xxxxxxxxx>, "Charles Shaban" <cshaban@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Addition to Section 4.2.1
  • From: "Alexei Sozonov" <sozon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:35:06 -0800

I'm strongly support this

Alexei




----- Original Message ----- From: "subbiah" <subbiah@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Charles Shaban" <cshaban@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Yoav Keren'" <yoav@xxxxxxxx>; <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Addition to Section 4.2.1





Apologies to Charles. He is indeed right, in a previous version he had already asked for that minor change which is also more accurate.

Also in my email - potentail non-support was 3 not 4 and that for a stronger version. For this version it may even be less, while support is at 10 or more folks, by my estimation below.


Charles Shaban wrote:


Just to be showing the facts, change run to supported please:

subbiah <subbiah@xxxxxxxxx> on Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 4:46 PM
+0000 wrote:

Support for considering and not penalising any pioneering,
pre-existing developments regarding IDN gTLDs with widespread language community support, for example, the experimental IDN system run
supported
by the Arab League, China and other countries in a smaller scale when
considering introduction of new IDN gTLDs, to avoid potential confusion/backlash.








-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.15/728 - Release Date: 3/20/2007





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy