<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.2
- To: "'Sophia B'" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.2
- From: "Shahram Soboutipour" <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:54:08 +0330
Hi
Regarding 4.3.2:
I do support this change too.
Regards,
<BLOCKED::mailto:soboutipour@xxxxxxxxxxx> Shahram Soboutipour
President and CEO
<BLOCKED::http://www.karmania.ir/> Karmania Media
Tel: +98 341 2117844,5
Mobile: +98 913 1416626
Fax: +98 341 2117851
_____
size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
From: owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sophia B
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:41 AM
To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx; GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.2
4.3.2
I though this minor change of adding a clause to this alternative view would
allow both flexability for the gTLDs operators while reducing any possible
confusion.
Alternative view; to afford latitude for gTLDs to set policy for IDN SLDs on
condition that any selected policy that is uniform for all concerned gTLDs and
that such a policy is approved by ICANN before hand.
Sophia
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|