<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Document for final review
- To: <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Document for final review
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:47:25 -0400
Thanks Mark. It was too bad you were unable to join any of our calls
but your extensive input at the beginning got us going.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
________________________________
From: Mark McFadden - ISPCP Secretariat
[mailto:mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:18 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Document for final review
I apologize for not being to make any of the conference calls (I
was in the midst of a vacation), but I'd simply like to add a note of
congratulations to the group. The document looks very good.
Thanks again and my apologies for not being available for the
calls.
mark
From: owner-gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 1:51 PM
To: gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Document for final review
Importance: High
Here is the document for final review by our working group.
Everyone has 24 hours from now to review and submit any input; that
means that comments are required NLT the following times:
Tuesday, 21 August at: 22:00 EEST/IDT, 21:00 CEST, 19:00
UTC/GMT, 15:00 EDT, 12:00 PDT
Wednesday, 22 August at: 03:00 SGT
Please note that all changes were accepted from our meeting
today except for the following that are highlighted in the document:
* The use of the word 'commercial' was deleted in three
places in response to a comment submitted by Mawaki Chango, an observer
to our list. That comment can be found at the end of the first
paragraph of Section A. The deletion occurred on pages 2, 3 and 10.
* The wording discussed in today's meeting regarding the
responses to the four subquestions under "b) Who decides on the
delegation and in particular: " on page 16.
Regarding the second bullet, Olof and I tried to capture the
wording we believe was agreed to in concept in our meeting today.
Please let me know if we did not succeed in that regard and suggest any
needed edits. If none are communicated on this list, I will assume
there are none and I will send the document to the Council.
Thanks again for all of the hard work. I will use this list to
keep you informed of Council progress.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|