Re: [gnso-idng] no conf call today

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

ok, was all ready for it, but i am ok with not having a call.

while i have a pretty good idea where we are with the problem statement (lost 
somewhere in limbo and it is partly my fault)

where are we with the charter for whatever it was we wanted to propose for a WG.

or have we gotten to the point where we are just spinning our wheels arguing 
whether semantic similarity was intended for recommendation 2 by the GNSO 
council or not.

a.

On 16 Dec 2009, at 21:44, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> 
> I thought it was confirmed.  Gisella sent out a notice and I put it on
> my calendar.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 3:40 PM
>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-idng] no conf call today
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> Apologies for such a late notice.  As we have not confirmed 
>> the call for today, please consider that there is no call 
>> scheduled for the IDNG discussion.
>> Edmon
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>