| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [gnso-idng] an initial rough draft of a motion and letter
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] an initial rough draft of a motion and letterFrom: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:35:59 -0400 
 
I did not intend that Avri so please let me know what in it gave you
that impression.
Chuck 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:55 AM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] an initial rough draft of a motion and letter
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> At first reading this seems as if it includes the possibility 
> of suggesting changes to the intial evaluation on strings.  
> Maybe I am misreading, so please correct me if I am.
> 
> I do not think that the NCSG would be able to accept that and 
> I certainly don't.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 24 Apr 2010, at 10:35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > <New gTLD Rec2 WG Charter Draft 1.doc>
> 
> 
> 
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |