<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:05:14 -0400
I support this motion as modified by Avri. Can we assume that all of us
on this list support it? Anyone opposed?
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on
> extended evaluation.
>
> Hi,
>
> I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
>
> So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that
> someone from the council will make/second the edited motion
> (attached)?
>
> If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|