RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion

["David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>]

Thomas:
In answer to question 1, I believe it is reasonable to ask to see evidence of 
harm.
Question 2  - N/A
David
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President - Law & Policy
Public Interest Registry
+1 312 375 4849
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Thomas Rickert [rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:18 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion

All,
following up on yesterday's call I would like to ask all of you to answer 
either of the following questions. As you will remember, there was some debate 
surrounding the question if and what evidence of harm needs to be presented to 
the group and Chuck proposed the following questions, which I have modified a 
bit:

1. Are there those who want to see evidence of harm before considering granting 
protections?

2. Are there those who are requiring protections who are unwilling to provide 
information? If so, are you offering other or a subset of the information 
required according to the survey sheet.

Please answer the question by next Tuesday.

Thanks,
Thomas