<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Qualification Criteria - common ground?
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO IGO INGO" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Qualification Criteria - common ground?
- From: "Christopher Lamb" <christopher.lamb17@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:59:03 +1100
Me too, for A, thanks a lot
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 4:13 PM
To: GNSO IGO INGO
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Qualification Criteria - common ground?
+1 for Option A
On 10 Feb 2013, at 16:53, Mason Cole wrote:
Option A is my preference as well.
On Feb 9, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
Option A is my preference.
Thanks,
Robin Gross
On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
All,
as discussed during yesterday's call, I would like to sound out whether
there is some common ground with respect to the qualification criteria
regarding the following proposals developed during the call. These
suggestions seemed to have some supporters each:
Option A:
Protection of a name or an organization by virtue of an international
treaty AND protection in multiple jurisdictions.
Option B:
The existence of a name, acronym or designation by virtue of an
international treaty AND the requirement of the organization to be
mandated to work in the global public interest.
(Note: It was proposed that the global public interest can be shown by
existing protection under multiple national laws).
I repeat my encouragement to continue our vivid exchange of thoughts on
the mailing list. Please let the group know whether you like both or one
or a variation of the above or none of the options.
This exercise should help us find out whether we can use one or both
options as a starting point for developing a proposal supported by a
considerable part of the group.
Thanks,
Thomas
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|