<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Qualification Criteria - common ground?
- To: GNSO IGO INGO <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Qualification Criteria - common ground?
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:27:45 -0500
On 12 Feb 2013, at 17:53, Jim Bikoff wrote:
> Under Option A, “Protection of a name or an organization by virtue of an
> international treaty and/or national laws in multiple jurisdictions” is an
> appropriate criterion.
>
I for one do _not_ accept this redefinition of Option A.
Call it option C, if you need to put it in the mix, but it is _not_ Option A.
I do not wish for my support of Option A, to morph into apparent support for
this new Option.
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|