Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed protection matrix - to be discussed during the next call

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think this is well stated.  I think the task of this group is purely centered 
on the Public Interest question.

What should we recommend in regard to the global Public Interest that balances 
the various stakeholder interests.

As I am attending the WSIS+10 and IGF week in Paris, I won't be participating 
at today's meeting, but will catch up later.

avri 


On 27 Feb 2013, at 12:04, Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT wrote:

> Where the law mandates an open door, let’s recommend ICANN obey the law.  
> Where the law does not mandate an open door but the public interest does, 
> then let’s open that one door on that clearly defined rationale.  Different 
> organizations will certainly pass through, we can even predict some.  But 
> that organizations can satisfy entry criteria in different ways doesn’t 
> justify opening different doors for different applicants (even if they have 
> been cueing for longer).
>  
> May I suggest we define the rationale first, then from this consider how 
> different organizations might satisfy that entry rationale?
>