<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-igo-ingo] RE: GNSO IGO DRP Report
- To: Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: GNSO IGO DRP Report
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 15:40:32 +0000
It seems to me that this document could provide a good basis for modifying RPMs
to include any IGOs or INGOs. The DRP in this case was viewed as a separate
policy from the UDRP. We could approach it that way as well. I personally
think that this document shows that a lot of work has already been done at
least with regard to IGOs.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-
> ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Peck
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] GNSO IGO DRP Report
>
> All,
>
> As a follow up to the reference during the call, please find attached
> the GNSO IGO Dispute Resolution Procedure Report from 2007.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|