ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Draft paragraph for temporary agreement on qualifying criteria

  • To: "Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Draft paragraph for temporary agreement on qualifying criteria
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:17:58 +0000

Thanks Mary.
With regard to 'multiple jurisdictions', what if we were to approach in a 
manner like the following:  "protected by national laws in multiple 
jurisdictions in a majority of ICANN regions".  One of my intents is to avoid a 
situation where one region has a determining influence or where just one 
country in each of 2 or 3 regions could have a determining influence.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:55 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Draft paragraph for temporary agreement on qualifying 
criteria


Draft of working framework for qualifying criteria - to be further discussed 
(including added to or changed, if appropriate) upon discussion of possible 
protection mechanisms:


"The Working Group (WG) agrees that the following is a general description and 
starting point for final resolution of the types of organizations that may 
qualify for protection mechanisms (if any). The WG believes that it would be 
useful, in coming to a final resolution of qualifying criteria, to park the 
issue for now in order to discuss possible protection mechanisms, which 
discussion may inform the WG's deliberations over qualifying criteria. The WG 
intends to return to the issue of qualifying criteria at an appropriate point 
in its discussions of possible protection mechanisms.


The basic ground upon which either an IGO or INGO may qualify for specific 
protections is that an organization has a mission that is in the global public 
interest and whose operations are international in scope. The WG acknowledges 
that it is extremely difficult to define the global public interest and it may 
be that it would be inappropriate for either it or ICANN to attempt to do so. 
Nevertheless, the WG agrees that the following factors may serve as indications 
that a particular organization would qualify for protection:


(1) The organization, its names, acronyms and (where applicable) its 
designation are protected by an international treaty; or

(2) The organization, its names, acronyms and (where applicable) its 
designation are protected by national laws in multiple jurisdictions, and its 
organizational mission is recognized through inclusion on the ECOSOC list of 
general consultative NGOs (or similar list)."


Cheers

Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
http://ssrn.com/author=437584



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy