Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Deadlines in New gTLD Committee Resolution on IGO names

[Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for this, Brian.

Luckily, my memory did not fail me :-).

Thomas


Am 06.03.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>:

> As a follow-up to our discussion at the end of the call on the 26 November 
> Resolution regarding the protection of IGO names at the second level of the 
> first round of new gTLDs, the 28 Feb. 2013 deadline was for both the GNSO to 
> provide advice as well as for IGOs to apply to ICANN to be listed on the 
> reserved names list.  The language is provided below, the entire resolution 
> and rationale can be found at: 
> 
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-26nov12-en.htm#1.b
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Brian 
> 
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN 
> 
> RESOLVED (2012.11.26.NG02), the Board requests that the GNSO Council advise 
> the Board by no later than 28 February 2013 if it is aware of any concern 
> such as with the global public interest or the security or stability of the 
> DNS, that the Board should take into account in making its decision about 
> whether to include second level protections for certain IGO names and 
> acronyms by inclusion on a Reserved Names List in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the 
> Applicant Guidebook, applicable in all new gTLD registries approved in the 
> first round of the New gTLD Program. The specific IGO names to be protected 
> shall be those names or acronyms that: 1) qualify under the current existing 
> criteria to register a domain name in the .int gTLD; and 2) have a registered 
> .int domain OR a determination of eligibility under the .int criteria; and 3) 
> apply to ICANN to be listed on the reserved names list for the second level 
> prior to the delegation of any new gTLDs by no later than 28 February 2013.