RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Initial Report - WORKING DRAFT

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for taking a first crack at this Berry.



I may be misunderstanding something, but the following sections seems too 
simplistic to me:



"5.1               Working Group Deliberations

Essentially by two divergent positions exist:

1)      stakeholders that do not believe that any special protections should be 
afforded because existing RPMs are adequate, or

2)      stakeholders that request permanent protections at both the top and 
second levels to also include an exception process where protected organization 
may wish to register their respective identifier"

I would agree that these two positions probably represent the two extremes but 
they certainly are not the only two positions being discussed.  There a lots of 
variations in between.

Chuck



________________________________
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] on behalf 
of Berry Cobb [mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:58 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Initial Report - WORKING DRAFT

WG Team,

Attached is the latest draft of the Initial Report for the IGO-INGO.  This 
document is still very much work in progress and a few edits/changes may come 
back prior to our face to face meeting on Monday.  In essence the structure of 
our meeting will be to review/discuss/determine level of consensus on the 
proposed recommendations matrix in Section 5.

In the meantime, if you have any suggestions please send them my way, and I 
will incorporate into the master version.

Thank you.

Berry Cobb