<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Public Comment Period for Initial Report
- To: GNSO IGO INGO <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Public Comment Period for Initial Report
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:00:39 -0400
+1
On 13 Jun 2013, at 11:20, David W. Maher wrote:
>
> I support the proposed schedule.
> David W. Maher
> Senior Vice President – Law & Policy
> Public Interest Registry
> 312 375 4849
>
> From: Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:10 AM
> To: GNSO IGO INGO <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] FW: Proposed Public Comment Period for Initial Report
>
> Dear WG Members,
>
> We are planning to publish the Initial Report for public comment tomorrow, 14
> June and wanted to provide you with the proposed public comment and reply
> periods. Taking into consideration that the PDP WG Charter mandates the WG
> to fulfill the requirements of the PDP "in an expedited manner," while also
> recognizing that under the minimum 21 day requirements for the public comment
> period and reply period each, the reply period would be open between 6 July
> and 26 July during which the Durban Meeting will take place, after consulting
> with Thomas as Chair, we are proposing the following timeframes:
>
> Extend the public comment period by 9 days to provide a 30 day period,
> starting 14 June and ending at 23:59 on Sunday, 14 July
> Maintain the 21 day period for the reply period, starting 15 July and ending
> at 23:59 on Sunday, 4 August.
>
> By extending the public comment period this would provide as much time as
> possible prior to the starting date of the Durban Meeting (instead of the 21
> day period ending on 5 July), while also pushing back the reply period
> deadline by nine days to provide extra time after the Durban meeting. We
> realize that the timing of this public forum during the Durban Meeting is not
> the most optimal, but given the Charter mandate we hope you agree that this
> is a workable solution.
>
> As we would like to publish the report tomorrow please advise if there are
> any strong objections as soon as possible but no later than tomorrow, Friday
> 14 June at 12:00 UTC – otherwise we will go with this schedule. Thank you
> very much for your continued support and contributions to the WG.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|