ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session

  • To: GNSO IGO INGO <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 07:38:33 -0400

+1

On 1 Jul 2013, at 04:04, Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> This proposed heading is problematic:
>  
> Proposition A: Protections should be provided to identifiers of qualifying 
> IGOs.
> Proposition B: Protections should be provided to identifiers of the RCRC & 
> IOC.
> Proposition C: Protections should be provided to identifiers of other INGOs 
> that are not covered by international treaty & national law protections like 
> the RCRC & IOC
> Proposition D: Protections should not be provided to any IGOs or INGOs
>  
> We have had serious discussion about the applicability of these two 
> categories of legal protection to INGOs, including the IOC.  This heading 
> gives the impression that the IOC/RCRC have identical protections (which is 
> not the case), that these are identical to IGOs (since they are not off-set 
> in Prop A, and which is also not the case), and that INGOs cannot rely on 
> legal protections in similar categories (we’ve had several discussions about 
> this).
>  
> May I suggest to correct this by simply adding the word “other” and delete 
> the text in yellow?
>  
> Sincerely,
> Claudia
>  
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: 2013-06-27 21:04
> To: Brian Peck; GNSO IGO INGO
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
>  
> Thanks Brian.  I inserted some proposed edits and comments in the attached 
> file.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Brian Peck
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:27 PM
> To: GNSO IGO INGO
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
>  
> Dear WG Members,
>  
> Please find attached an updated version of the proposed format for the 
> IGO/INGO public session in Durban which hopefully reflects the WG's 
> discussions earlier today.  Please advise if you have any comments or 
> questions – in the meantime, we will also submit this document to Xplane, the 
> professional facilitator, to see if they have any suggestions.  Thanks.  
>  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Brian 
>  
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director ICANN 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy