<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
- To: GNSO IGO INGO <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 07:38:33 -0400
+1
On 1 Jul 2013, at 04:04, Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This proposed heading is problematic:
>
> Proposition A: Protections should be provided to identifiers of qualifying
> IGOs.
> Proposition B: Protections should be provided to identifiers of the RCRC &
> IOC.
> Proposition C: Protections should be provided to identifiers of other INGOs
> that are not covered by international treaty & national law protections like
> the RCRC & IOC
> Proposition D: Protections should not be provided to any IGOs or INGOs
>
> We have had serious discussion about the applicability of these two
> categories of legal protection to INGOs, including the IOC. This heading
> gives the impression that the IOC/RCRC have identical protections (which is
> not the case), that these are identical to IGOs (since they are not off-set
> in Prop A, and which is also not the case), and that INGOs cannot rely on
> legal protections in similar categories (we’ve had several discussions about
> this).
>
> May I suggest to correct this by simply adding the word “other” and delete
> the text in yellow?
>
> Sincerely,
> Claudia
>
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: 2013-06-27 21:04
> To: Brian Peck; GNSO IGO INGO
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
>
> Thanks Brian. I inserted some proposed edits and comments in the attached
> file.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Brian Peck
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:27 PM
> To: GNSO IGO INGO
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Updated Proposed Format for Durban Public Session
>
> Dear WG Members,
>
> Please find attached an updated version of the proposed format for the
> IGO/INGO public session in Durban which hopefully reflects the WG's
> discussions earlier today. Please advise if you have any comments or
> questions – in the meantime, we will also submit this document to Xplane, the
> professional facilitator, to see if they have any suggestions. Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director ICANN
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|