ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-igo-ingo] Red Cross and Red Crescent comments - GNSO IGO-INGO PDP Working Group Recommendations

  • To: <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Red Cross and Red Crescent comments - GNSO IGO-INGO PDP Working Group Recommendations
  • From: Stephane Hankins <shankins@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:14:40 +0200

Dear Thomas, dear all, 

(1) Further to Thomas' recent message including his assessment as Chair of 
the consensus level within the IGO-INGO Working Group, we would like 
herewith to acknowledge receipt of the proposed set of recommendations and 
of the attached assessment of their respective consensus level (which also 
appear in the draft Final Report). We are grateful to Thomas and to the 
ICANN Staff colleagues for compiling this document and for all the work 
carried out in recent months. 

(2) As indicated in our last e-mail message to the Group sent prior to 
last week's call, we remain concerned that the requests for a permanent 
protection of the red cross and red crescent designations and of the names 
of the respective Red Cross and Red Crescent Organizations are only partly 
covered under the proposed recommendations. 

We also note that the propositions/recommendations pertaining to the 
protections of the red cross and red crescent designations and names on 
which the consensus level is being assessed only partially reflect the 
scope of the requests the International Red Cross and Red Crescent 
Movement has been formally representing (in particular, our request that 
the so-called Scope 2 names be awarded the same top-level and second-level 
protections as those included in Scope 1). Even if the assessment is that 
consensus is lacking or that there is opposition to the reservation of the 
Red Cross and Red Crescent Scope 2 names, it is unclear to us why our 
request in this respect is not included under the Red Cross and Red 
Crescent recommendations column, lest with an assessment of the divergence 
within the Group. 
The following propositions/recommendations relating to Scope 2 identifiers 
could be added (with the assessed level of support included in the right 
column): 
·       Top-Level protections of Exact Match, Full Name Scope 2 
identifiers of the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement are placed in the 
Applicant Guidebook section 2.2.1.2.3, Strings "Ineligible for Delegation"
·       For RCRC Scope 2 identifiers, if placed in the Applicant Guidebook 
as ineligible for delegation, an exception procedure should be created for 
cases where a protected organization wishes to apply for their protected 
string at the Top-Level
·       Second-Level protections of only Exact Match, Full Name Scope 2 
identifiers of the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement are placed in 
Specification 5 of the Registry Agreement
·       For RCRC Scope 2 identifiers, if placed in Specification 5 of the 
Registry Agreement, an exception procedure should be created for cases 
where a protected organization wishes to apply for their protected string 
at the Second-Level

(3) We will await the final version of the recommendations/Report before 
submitting, as may be required, a new minority position to be reflected 
in, or adjoined to, the WG's recommendations to the GNSO. 

Best regards, 

Stéphane and Chris 
Stéphane J. Hankins 
Legal adviser 
Cooperation and coordination within the Movement 
International Committee of the Red Cross 
Tel (direct line): ++0041 22 730 24 19 
Email: shankins@xxxxxxxx 

Christopher M. Rassi 
Senior Legal Officer 
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies 
Chemin des Crêts, 17 | 1209 Petit Saconnex | Geneva | Switzerland 
Tel. +41 (0)22 730 4536 | Fax +41 (0)22 733 0395 
Email: christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx 

----- Forwarded by Stephane Hankins/DC_MOUV_CHF/GVA/ICRC on 11.09.2013 
15:05 -----

From:   Stephane Hankins/DC_MOUV_CHF/GVA/ICRC
To:     <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc:     Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Peck 
<brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>, "mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx, <Catherine.Gribbin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   03.09.2013 19:39
Subject:        [gnso-igo-ingo] Red Cross and Red Crescent Minority 
Position on the GNSO IGO-INGO PDP Working Group Recommendations 


Dear Thomas, 
Dear Members of the GNSO IGO-INGO PDP Working Group,

Please find attached the "Minority Position" of the Red Cross and Red 
Crescent on the GNSO IGO-INGO PDP Working Group Recommendations. The 
latter highlights the unaddressed and remaining requests for the 
protection of the Red Cross and Red Crescent designations and names.



With our best regards,
Stéphane J. Hankins 
Legal adviser 
Cooperation and coordination within the Movement 
International Committee of the Red Cross 
Tel (direct line): ++0041 22 730 24 19 
Email: shankins@xxxxxxxx 

Christopher M. Rassi 
Senior Legal Officer 
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies 
Chemin des Crêts, 17 | 1209 Petit Saconnex | Geneva | Switzerland 
Tel. +41 (0)22 730 4536 | Fax +41 (0)22 733 0395 
Email: christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx 



===============================================================================
The ICRC - working to protect and assist people affected by armed conflict and
other situations of violence. Find out more: www.icrc.org

This e-mail is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
Its contents are confidential and may only be retained by the named recipient
(s) and may only be copied or disclosed with the consent of the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). If you are not an intended recipient please
delete this e-mail and notify the sender. 
===============================================================================

Attachment: Minority Position of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement.3 September 2013.docx
Description:



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy