<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IOC Position on Working Group Recommendations
- To: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IOC Position on Working Group Recommendations
- From: Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:29:50 +0400
Dear Jim,
Please see chain pasted below:
Thank you Thomas – we will be sure to do that,and will revert as quickly as
possible.
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency
208 389-5779 PH
From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:21 PM
To: Elisa Cooper
Cc: Berry Cobb; BC Executive Committee; Steve DelBianco
Subject: Re: IGO-INGO Protections
Elisa,
thanks for the update. We would appreciate your input at your earliest
convenience as we need to finalize the draft final report for public comment.
Kind regards,
Thomas
Am 11.09.2013 um 17:57 schrieb Elisa Cooper:
Thomas and Berry,
I wanted to let you know that we will provide you with our input, but
unfortunately, there are still a couple of areas where we need further
discussion.
We will provide our input as soon as we can, but I don’t think we will be able
to make the noon ET deadline – so my apologies.
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency
208 389-5779 PH
From: bc-excomm-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:bc-excomm-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:08 AM
To: Thomas Rickert; Berry Cobb
Cc: BC Executive Committee
Subject: [Bc-excomm] IGO-INGO Protections
Thomas and Berry — you ask a fair question, and deserve an answer. But the BC
has been consumed with multiple public comments over the past several weeks and
IGO-NGO was something we could not get to.
However, looking at the v2 document, it seems we might be able to rely on
previous BC positions to give you and indication. Let me review and ask the BC
Executive Committee for approval.
Will do our best to respond before your call today.
Regards,
Steve
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 7:15 AM
To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IGO-INGO Protections
Zahid and Steve,
we have our next call at 16 UTC today. I offer multiple drinks in Buenos Aires
to both of you if you come up with information on this before the call :-).
Happy to discuss on the phone, too. I can be reached at +49 172 2141 564.
Thanks and kind regards,
Thomas
=============
thomas-rickert.tel
+49.228.74.898.0
Am 10.09.2013 um 01:07 schrieb "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Zahid and Steve,
Has the BC been able to consider any of the proposed protections for the
IGO-INGOs? It will be helpful if the BC can weigh in on these so that we can
accurately reflect consensus levels for the WG in preparation for when the
Final Report is submitted to the Council.
I’d appreciate hearing your position.
Thank you. B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
@berrycobb
<IGO-INGO_Consensus_Recommendations_v2.2.doc>
<IGO-INGO_Consensus_Recommendations_v1.2.doc>
Best regards,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 213 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 213 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the
intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute
privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
Jamil is prohibited.
Sent from my Windows Phone
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jim Bikoff" <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 04/09/2013 02:35
To: "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] IOC Position on Working Group Recommendations
Dear Thomas and all,
Attached are the IOC responses to the Working Group draft recommendations.
We look forward to the call tomorrow.
Best regards,
Jim
James L. Bikoff
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
1101 30th Street, NW
Suite 120
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: 202-944-3303
Fax: 202-944-3306
jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
[The entire original message is not included.]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|