<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Missing part of ALAC comments on draft report.
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>,        IGO INGO	<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Missing part of ALAC comments on draft report.
 
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:42:24 +0000
 
 
 
Thanks Alan.  I have two questions for you:
1.  What would a " a cohesive and consistent set of policies " look like?  I 
didn't understand your point in the call today and still don't.
2.  Recognizing that the procedures still have to be developed, why do you 
doubt that " the exception procedures outlined in the report would be effective 
"?  Another way to ask my questions is this:  why do you think that effective 
exception procedures could not be developed?
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 1:12 PM
To: IGO INGO
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Missing part of ALAC comments on draft report.
As I mentioned on the call today, the specific positions on the recommendations 
was accidentally omitted. Here is the content (the ALAC statement minus the 
formal header). I will ensure that the formal statement is amended.
Alan
 
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |