<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Missing part of ALAC comments on draft report.
- To: "'IGO INGO'" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Missing part of ALAC comments on draft report.
- From: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:43:07 -0700
Hi Alan,
Per our discussion today, I reconciled ALAC support/no support for the
recommendations and unsupported proposals within the Final Report. All
looks to be in order from my review. When you review the next version,
please take a quick review as well to ensure I captured the ALAC position
appropriately.
Thank you. B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
@berrycobb
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 11:12
To: IGO INGO
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Missing part of ALAC comments on draft report.
As I mentioned on the call today, the specific positions on the
recommendations was accidentally omitted. Here is the content (the ALAC
statement minus the formal header). I will ensure that the formal statement
is amended.
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|