ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Final Report v1.7.1

  • To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Final Report v1.7.1
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:12:23 +0000


On page 10 of the redline document under Minority Statements, I note that only 
the RCRC statement is shown.  I think that that is supposed to be a reference 
to the general supplemental document A instead of the RCRC statement.  That 
correction was made on page 3 but not on page 10.

In footnote 27, it would be helpful, although not essential, to name the 
Supplement, i.e., something like this:  " . . . see the IGO's Minority 
Statement in the Minority Positions supplement, Supplement A."

I also found on page 65 that the link to the attendance record requires login 
to Confluence.  That was no problem for me but might be for those who have not 
yet created a login ID & password.  On a totally different point for GNSO 
consideration, not for this report, I think it would be good if staff made the 
following improvement in attendance record reporting:  In the group summaries, 
add boxes for total meetings, # in which the group was represented by at least 
one person & the %.  The percent of total meeting opportunities attended is 
very misleading;  for example, the report shows that the RrSG a meeting 
opportunity attendance rate of 34% while the RySG 's was 32% and the NCSG was 
18%.  The numbers are heavily skewed by the number of participants in a group 
as well as the number of individuals in a group that missed a lot of meetings.  
As everyone knows and as the data shows, the RySG and NCSG (as well as other 
groups) had representation in a very high percentage of the meetings while the 
RrSG was represented in a very low percentage of the meetings.  Again, this is 
not something for this report but a proposed improvement in reporting 
attendance in the future.  (BTW, the link to the email archives does not 
require login to Confluence, so it worked as expected.)  - Note that if fixing 
the link is not an easy task, it should not delay submitting the report.

Everything else looks fine to me.


From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 7:30 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Final Report v1.7.1

WG Members,

Please find attached the latest version of the Final Report and its 
supplements.  For this version, I accepted all the prior changes.  I'm awaiting 
input from the GCO about the two issues we discussed in today's call regarding 
the principles of implementation.

I ask members to review the latest draft closely and provide any additional 
feedback noting of any errors in reference or other small content changes to 
correct grammar or reduce confusion.

I will accept any suggested revisions until 9 Nov 2013 @ 23:59.  If no 
objections are made, I will update the master version and prepare the final 
draft.  I intend to send the report and supplements, along with a cover note to 
the GNSO Council on 9 Nov 2013 @ 16:00 UTC.

Thank you for everyone's contribution and I look forward to seeing many of you 
in BA.

Thank you.  B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy