<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] Re: A possible fix?
- To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] Re: A possible fix?
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:01:48 +0000
1. Gaining.
2. So just ServerTransferProhibited, then. :)
J.
From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 16:53
To: James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: A possible fix?
Sorry I missed the call
James:
1 - which registrar? Gaining? Losing? Both?
2 - um .. hangon, unless I'm missing something that would also prevent a
nameserver update, wouldn't it? (Bear in mind I'm quite tired this evening, so
I could be wrong)
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Domains
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
From:
owner-gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:44 PM
To: gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] A possible fix?
Hi folks. Hope no one was discouraged following todays call. These things are
very difficult (if they weren't anyone could do them)...but not impossible!
So thinking a bit more, I believe we can address some of these issues by
requiring two practices:
(1) Registrars must take two WHOIS "snapshots": One to obtain the FOA, and one
at Transfer execution.
(2) Registries must "lock" (ServerUpdateProhibited,
ServerTransferProhibited,ServerDeleteProhibited) on all names known to be
subject to a UDRP or TDRP.
Reasoning: By comparing the WHOIS record at both occasions, the Gaining
Registrar can spot any differences in Registrant data or Domain Status. This
will provide the necessary visibility to invalidate the FOA and re-authorize
the transfer.
Thoughts?
J.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|