Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

[Theo Geurts <theo.geurts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hiya's 

Personally speaking, I am good with a 6 month cycle. 
Then again, I been looking at this since November last year and had several 
team meetings at the office, and since we use the scrum methodology for a few 
years now we simply add this to a few sprints. 
For other Registrars I could imagine they need more time, not every Registrar 
is a member of the RrSG (sad but true) and then there is that huge blind spot 
called Asia. None of them where present during the WG or IRT, nor did we 
receive any comments from that region. 

Best, 

Theo 


Van: "Caitlin Tubergen" <caitlin.tubergen@xxxxxxxxx> 
Aan: gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx 
Verzonden: Vrijdag 24 juli 2015 04:33:53 
Onderwerp: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + 
implementation timing 



Hi, Team. 



This is reminder to provide any final feedback on the attached draft by 
Thursday, 30 July . If I do not receive any feedback on the draft, I will 
consider the text final. 



Also, I asked the members on the call about timing for coming into compliance 
once the policy is announced. The default policy cycle is six months ( 
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may15-en.pdf
 ), but the members on the call today asked for registrars’ input on if six 
months is enough time. We may, for example, choose to deviate from the standard 
six-month cycle. 



As there are no calls scheduled at this time, please provide any feedback you 
have over the email list. 



Thank you! 



Kind regards, 



Caitlin 


From: Caitlin Tubergen < caitlin.tubergen@xxxxxxxxx > 
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 5:21 PM 
To: " gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx " < gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx > 
Subject: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing 

Hi, Team. 

For those of you unable to make it to today’s call, please find a recording 
here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p4maun572zp/ . 

I have attached the latest draft of the policy, which has a small change as a 
result of today’s call. There are also a few numbering changes. 

There are a few things that we are awaiting feedback on. Specifically, please 
take a look at: 

(1) the definition of “Designated Agent” in paragraph 1(c). 

(2) the circumstances described in paragraph 2.3, specifically 2.3(iv). (The 
IRT wanted to confirm that this gave registrars enough flexibility to update 
Whois information in the event of potential abuse). 

Also, I asked the members on the call about timing for coming into compliance 
once the policy is announced. The default policy cycle is six months ( 
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may15-en.pdf
 ), but the members on the call today asked for registrars input on if six 
months is enough time. We may, for example, choose to deviate from the standard 
six month cycle. 

If you have any further comments on the attached draft or on the policy cycle 
timing, please provide feedback by Thursday, 30 July , two weeks from today’s 
date. 

Thank you! 

Kind regards, 

Caitlin Tubergen 
Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager 
ICANN