Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

[Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Michele.  

The RrSG has been given until Tuesday, 4 August, to provide feedback
regarding implementation timing.

As a reminder ‹ if anyone from the Implementation Review Team has any
feedback on the latest version of the draft, please provide it by tomorrow,
Thursday, 30 July.

Many thanks,

Caitlin 


From:  Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM
To:  Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc:  "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy +
implementation timing

Caitlin

Having discussed this within the RrSG we need more time to provide feedback
to you

Regards

Michele 

Mr Michele Neylon 
Blacknight Hosting & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://www.mneylon.social
Sent from mobile so typos and brevity are normal

On 23 Jul 2015, at 19:34, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi, Team.
>  
> This is reminder to provide any final feedback on the attached draft by
> Thursday, 30 July.  If I do not receive any feedback on the draft, I will
> consider the text final.
>  
> Also, I asked the members on the call about timing for coming into compliance
> once the policy is announced.  The default policy cycle is six months
> (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may1
> 5-en.pdf 
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may1
> 5-en.pdf> ), but the members on the call today asked for registrars¹ input on
> if six months is enough time.  We may, for example, choose to deviate from the
> standard six-month cycle.
>  
> As there are no calls scheduled at this time, please provide any feedback you
> have over the email list.
>  
> Thank you!
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Caitlin 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 5:21 PM
> To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing
> 
> Hi, Team.
> 
> For those of you unable to make it to today¹s call, please find a recording
> here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p4maun572zp/.
> 
> I have attached the latest draft of the policy, which has a small change as a
> result of today¹s call.  There are also a few numbering changes.
> 
> There are a few things that we are awaiting feedback on.  Specifically, please
> take a look at:
> 
> (1) the definition of ³Designated Agent² in paragraph 1(c).
> 
> (2) the circumstances described in paragraph 2.3, specifically 2.3(iv).  (The
> IRT wanted to confirm that this gave registrars enough flexibility to update
> Whois information in the event of potential abuse).
> 
> Also, I asked the members on the call about timing for coming into compliance
> once the policy is announced.  The default policy cycle is six months
> (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may1
> 5-en.pdf), but the members on the call today asked for registrars input on if
> six months is enough time.  We may, for example, choose to deviate from the
> standard six month cycle.
> 
> If you have any further comments on the attached draft or on the policy cycle
> timing, please provide feedback by Thursday, 30 July, two weeks from today¹s
> date.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Caitlin Tubergen
> Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager
> ICANN
> 
> 
> <Transfer Policy 16Jul.docx>

Attachment: Transfer Policy 16Jul.docx
Description: Microsoft Office

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature