<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity
- To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:35:35 -0800
Hi Anne,
I'm not sure whether you are referring to the GNSO WG Guidelines or the revised
GNSO PDP. With regard to the latter, the revised GNSO PDP only entered into
force on 8 December of last year and even though all ongoing PDPs have now
converted to the revised GNSO PDP, there has not been a PDP that has been
conducted from start to finish under these new rules yet. It also might be
worth pointing out that the WT responsible for developing this revised PDP
recommended that 'periodic assessment of the overall PDP process is important,
noting that a certain threshold of completed PDPs should be met before an
overall review is carried out'. As a reminder, I've attached the overview of
the GNSO Improvement documents relevant to the SCI. I hope this is helpful.
With best regards,
Marika
From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:13:37 -0800
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity
I should think review of the revised PDP guidelines over the next year might be
appropriate. Not sure to what extent we want to survey as to WG issues that
arose before that. Some of the issues encountered there may well be addressed
by the new PDP guidelines.
Could someone please educate me as to the top GNSO improvements (other than
new PDP) over the past couple of years? As J. Scott's alternate, very happy
to meet in Costa Rica per schedule to be proposed by Wolf-Ulrich.
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original
message.
________________________________
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|