RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

 

For those of us who were unable to attend the SCI meeting in San Jose, will
there be a summary email sent out to advise what was discussed and what
decisions were taken there?  Please advise.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 7:59 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

 

All,

 

In addition to the tasks we took at our meeting the SCI is asked by the GNSO
council to look at the issue of GNSO Council deferral requests for motions.

As we agreed to reconvene after mid of April it would be helpful to prepare
a little in specifying the problem in more detail. Looking into how in the
past the council handled deferrals would be useful.

 

I'd therefore like to ask Marika whether staff would take over this survey.

 

>From my point of view the following criteria could apply for this survey:

- starting with council meetings under the new house structure

- type, name and date of motion deferred

- deferral requested by which SG/constituency

- rationale given for the request

- repeated request for deferral if applicable?

 

Please add any criteria which may be useful.

 

 

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich