ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: SCI meeting

  • To: <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: SCI meeting
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:37:04 +0200

No problem, Anne.
So let's talk today how we can proceed.



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 01:07
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: SCI meeting

Voting threshhold table per new By-Laws is still not finalized.  You are now on 
that group, Wolf.  I owe you and Marika my redline of the Word file she sent me.
Anne


Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700
One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:23 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting


 All,

For the next SCI meeting the following agenda is suggested:

- Roll call
- Statement of Interests
- Approval of the agenda
- Proxy voting
        explanation of the existing rules (staff)
        Discussion of reasons for problem with rules
        Discussion of possible remedies
        Discussion of pros and cons to modify the existing rules
- Consent agenda
        draft available?
        discussion along the questions raised last meeting (see Marika's notes)
- Deferral of motions
        draft available? (Ron/Angie)
- Voting threshold rules for delaying a PDP

This may fill up a 1 hr session. We may also need a cmplete task list and think 
about a timeline re the various topics.

Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich



----------------------
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311                           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090                            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200                     Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy