RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

[Krista Papac <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My initial reaction is we should stick with what's in the Charter and take 
requests from the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.

Krista Papac
General Manager, Policy & Industry Affairs
AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistry.com

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:55 AM
To: AAikman@xxxxxxxxx; marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx; avri@xxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

The charter reads:
<<For items that are submitted for review 'on request', the SCI expects to 
receive detailed input from the group affected by the process/operational 
change concerned. Such requests can be made by either the GNSO Council or a 
group chartered by the GNSO Council.>>

Request from individuals is not included.



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich


________________________________
Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 18:20
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; 
marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>; 
avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
Does the charter not define where the issues come from?  I would think it would 
have to be limited by the charter.
Anne

[cid:image001.gif@01CD4EB4.19BB2F70]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700
One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> * 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:18 AM
To: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>; 
avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
Personally my first reaction would be: we should handle it practically and with 
flexibility. Don't start amending the rules unless it is imperative.
Flexibility could mean that the SCI
- for a certain period of time (eg 1 year) monitors how many issues are raised 
by individuals/groups not covered by the charter. In case it exceeds a certain 
volume of requests (depending on the workload) the SCI may strictly return to 
the rules as written and not accept further requests from outside
- for the a.m. period of time the SCI may discuss all issues raised and make 
recommendations/suggestions re the issues in scope
- re Evan's SOI related issue I recall - if I'm right - that he was questioning 
the sense of some of the points asked for in the SOI. I think we should first 
find out whether his issue was more ALAC specific than relevant to the GNSO

What do others mean?


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich


________________________________
Von: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2012 14:47
An: Avri Doria; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Betreff: FW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
Hi Wolf, Avri,

Under AOB, you might also want to cover the update to the GNSO Council which is 
scheduled for Prague. In addition to getting clarification on who should be 
responsible for putting out SCI recommendations for public comments (also of 
relevance in relation to the item on consensus items), there is also this issue 
with regard to who may raise issues with the SCI. As you may recall, Evan 
Leibovitch raised a suggestion with regard to the SOI. There may be other 
questions / suggestions that individuals may make in the future relating to 
GNSO Improvements topics. However, the SCI charter says 'requests can be made 
by either the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO Council'. Should 
individual requests be directed to the GNSO Council for referral, or should 
there be another mechanism? It might be good to get clarification on this as 
well so it can be made clear to those that have proposals / questions.

With best regards,

Marika

From: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>" 
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

All:

this is the suggested agenda for the SCI call on Monday June 18, 13:00 UTC:

- Roll call
- Statement of Interests
- Approval of the agenda
- Background information (and suggested solutions) on
        - Deferral of Motions
        - Proxy Voting Procedure
        - Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP
- Consensus items: GNSO Council Voting Results Table, Consent Agenda
- AOB: next meeting, F2F in Prague?


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich





________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311



Reno (775)823-2900

Tucson (520)622-2090



Albuquerque (505)764-5400

Las Vegas (702)949-8200



Silicon Valley (650)391-1380


  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.