<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
- To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:18:40 +0200
Hi,
Just checking my interpretation of:
<<For items that are submitted for review ‘on request’, the SCI expects to
receive detailed input from the group affected by the process/operational
change concerned. Such requests can be made by either the GNSO Council or a
group chartered by the GNSO Council.>>
This means that issues can be brought by:
- the g-council itself
- a Working Group
- a drafting team
- a CWG chartered by the g-council
- any sort of group/team that the g-council has chartered
It does not include SG/C, as they are chartered by the Board and not the
g-council. If a SG/C wants to bring an item to the SCI, they must take it to
the g-council first.
If so, then what we are asking ALAC to do is not different than what we would
ask any SG/C to do.
But if the JAS or any of the other CWG's were to bring the issue, that would be
ok.
Do I interpret this as others would?
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|