ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

  • To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:18:40 +0200

Hi,

Just checking my interpretation of:

<<For items that are submitted for review ‘on request’, the SCI expects to 
receive detailed input from the group affected by the process/operational 
change concerned. Such requests can be made by either the GNSO Council or a 
group chartered by the GNSO Council.>>

This means that issues can be brought by:

- the g-council itself
- a Working Group
- a drafting team
- a CWG chartered by the g-council
- any sort of group/team that the g-council has chartered

It does not include SG/C, as they are chartered by the Board and not the 
g-council.  If a SG/C wants to bring an item to the SCI, they must take it to 
the g-council first.

If so, then what we are asking ALAC to do is not different than what we would 
ask any SG/C to do.

But if the JAS or any of the other CWG's were to bring the issue, that would be 
ok.

Do I interpret this as others would?

avri




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy