<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report
- To: <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:06:17 +0200
Thanks Angie, I'll include this
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: angie12345@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:angie12345@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Angie
Graves
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 21:40
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report
Hi All,
For the Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP, I see no content in the
presentation.
>From Marika, the current thresholds for terminating and initiating a PDP are
>as follows:
* Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
* Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described
in Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires
an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
A staff recommendation has been made but has not yet gained consensus in the
group.
Best regards,
Angie
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM,
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
All,
attached is the draft report to the council on Saturday morning. Please feel
free to comment/amend.
I'd like to send it to Glen by tomorrow 19:00 UTC for posting.
Best regards
Wolf-
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|