ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

  • To: <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:06:17 +0200

Thanks Angie, I'll include this



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich



________________________________
Von: angie12345@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:angie12345@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Angie 
Graves
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 21:40
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

Hi All,

For the Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP, I see no content in the 
presentation.

>From Marika, the current thresholds for terminating and initiating a PDP are 
>as follows:

 *   Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final 
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a 
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
 *   Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described 
in Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires 
an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than 
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.

A staff recommendation has been made but has not yet gained consensus in the 
group.

Best regards,

Angie


On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM, 
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
All,

attached is the draft report to the council on Saturday morning. Please feel 
free to comment/amend.
I'd like to send it to Glen by tomorrow 19:00 UTC for posting.

Best regards
Wolf-




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy