Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Deferrals - Key questions / logic points in order to try to achieve consensus

["J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for this Jonathan.


------------------------------
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 12:25 AM PDT Jonathan Robinson wrote:

>Key Questions / Issues
>
> 
>
>.         Do we permit 1st deferrals? 
>
>.         Do we require a reason / motivation for deferrals?
>
>.         If a reason is required / provided, is it subject to any test?
>
>.         Are 1st deferrals automatic or do we subject them to some form of
>vote / test?
>
>.         Can a deferral be overruled?  If so, what is the condition / test
>to overrule?
>
>.         Do we permit 2nd deferrals?
>
>.         If we permit 2nd deferrals, do we subject them to some form of
>vote / test?
>
>.         Do we permit 3rd deferrals?
>
> 
>
>My Answers
>
> 
>
>.         Do we permit 1st deferrals?
>Yes
>
>.         Do we require a reason / motivation for deferrals?
>Yes
>
>.         If a reason is required / provided, is it subject to any test?
>No, we trust the provider of the reason
>
>.         Are 1st deferrals automatically granted or do we subject them to
>some form of vote / test?
>Yes, they are automatically granted
>
>.         Can a 1st deferral be overruled?  If so, what is the condition /
>test to overrule?
>Yes, subject to a request from a councillor and a [supermajority] vote of
>the council to deny
>
>.         Do we permit 2nd deferrals?
>Yes
>
>.         If we permit 2nd deferrals, do we subject them to some form of
>vote / test?
>Yes, 2nd deferral requires a request from a councillor and a [supermajority]
>vote of the council to permit
>
>.         Do we permit 3rd deferrals?
>No.  A motion should be voted on or withdrawn at this stage.
>Note: I use "withdrawn" not "tabled" as tabled in my English, tabled means
>put forward / submitted not withdrawn
>