ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

  • To: "'Julie Hedlund'" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
  • From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:22:52 -0400

Thank you.

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.


 


-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:15 PM
To: Ron Andruff; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating
Procedures

Ron,

The changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures (consent agenda and
voting thresholds table) were out for public comment.  Here's the link:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-operating-procedures-2012-
09jul12-en.htm.

Thanks so much,
Julie

On 8/1/12 5:59 PM, "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out
>for
>public comment?
>
>As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no
>reason to change the normal process.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>RA
>
>Ronald N. Andruff
>RNA Partners, Inc.
>
>
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM
>To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating
>Procedures
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I
>recommend
>we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates.
>
>avri
>
>On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Julie.
>>  
>> Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being
>necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation
>process could be as usual.
>>  
>> 
>> Best regards 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Julie
>Hedlund
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12
>> An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>> Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating
>Procedures
>> 
>> Dear SCI members,
>> 
>> The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating
>>Procedures
>ended yesterday.  There was only one comment received.  It was from the
>Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes.  See:
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
>> 
>> The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August.
>Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue
>with the reply period.  Please let me know if you would like a different
>approach.
>> 
>> Thank you very much.
>> 
>>  Best regards,
>> 
>> Julie
>> 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy