<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Updates re: Today's SCI Agenda
- To: <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Updates re: Today's SCI Agenda
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 20:29:42 +0200
Thanks Julie
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. August 2012 17:08
An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Updates re: Today's SCI Agenda
Dear Wolf-Ulrich and SCI members,
Here are some updates relating to today's agenda. I can also address
these on the call later today.
Best regards,
Julie
Updates on selected agenda items:
4. Status update on community review - consent agenda & the GNSO Council
Voting Results
-- There is one comment from the Registries SG/David Maher in support of
the changes
-- The Reply Comment period has begun and ends on 20 August 2012
5. Continuing discussion -- Proxy Voting Procedure
-- Staff have determined that it is possible for the notification to go
both to the Secretariat and the Council at the same time. Staff awaits
determination by the SCI whether to institute this change, which is not a
change to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures, but merely a technical
change
On 8/6/12 7:58 AM, "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>All,
>
>as members participated in the poll it shows the most hits for 09 Aug.,
>19:00 UTC.
>Please be invited to this date with the following agenda which was
>deferred from 26 July:
>
>
>1. Roll call
>2. Statement of Interests
>3. Approval of the agenda
>4. Status update on community review - consent agenda & the GNSO Council
>Voting Results
>5. Continuing discussion (and suggested solutions) on
> - Proxy Voting Procedure
> Proposed: no change to procedure, request new method for
>notification of both Secretariat and Council (see action item on list)
> - Deferral of Motions
> Update on team work
> - Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP (see proposed language on
>list)
> Update on Team Work
>6. Raising an issue -
> Has this been sufficiently clarified - currently needs to come from
> g-council or from a WG
>7. Status update on Working Group survey (see attached survey)
>8. AOB
>
>Best regards
>Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gisella
>Gruber
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. August 2012 12:17
> An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] DOODLE SCI - August calls
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Further to Wolf-Ulrich's email, please complete the attached
>Doodle poll to schedule the SCI August calls, subject to summer vacation
>availability.
>
> http://doodle.com/xixcuxk469tci7h2
>
> Thank you.
> Kind regards,
> Gisella
>
> From: Wolf-Ullrich Knoben <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, 1 August 2012 07:27
> To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>,
>"Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx"
><gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - Proposed Agenda 26 July
>
>
> All,
>
> thank you very much for progressing during my absence and thanks
>in particular to Avri and staff for managing it.
> Usually we schedule our meetings around every 2 weeks which would
>mean 09 Aug for the next. But I'm not sure due to the summer vacation
>season.
> Could someone from staff please send out a doodle polling for the
>next four Thursdays, ie 09, 16, 23, 30 Aug?
>
>
>
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Julie
>Hedlund
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012 14:52
> An: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - Proposed
>Agenda 26 July
>
>
> Mary,
>
> You have a bit more time now. Wolf-Ulrich is on vacation
>and Avri has a conflict and cannot chair the meeting, so we have
>cancelled it. Of course, we can discuss your draft on the list after you
>send it.
>
> Thanks so much,
> Julie
>
> From: "Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx"
><Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx"
><gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - Proposed
>Agenda 26 July
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I believe I owe this group a draft on Item 6. Apologies
>for the delay - I will try to get one to J Scott for review before
>tomorrow's meeting.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
>
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science
>Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> >>>
> From: Julie Hedlund
><julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx"
><gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 7/25/2012 5:17 PM
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - Proposed
>Agenda 26 July
> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the SCI meeting
>on Thursday 26 July at 19.00 UTC.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Proposed Agenda - SCI Meeting - 26 July 2012
>
> 1. Roll call
> 2. Statement of Interests
> 3. Approval of the agenda
> 4. Status update on community review - consent agenda &
>the GNSO Council Voting Results
> 5. Continuing discussion (and suggested solutions) on
> - Proxy Voting Procedure
> Proposed: no change to procedure, request new
>method for notification of both Secretariat and Council (see action item
>on list)
> - Deferral of Motions
> Update on team work
> - Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP (see
>proposed language on list)
> Update on Team Work
> 6. Raising an issue -
> Has this been sufficiently clarified - currently
>needs to come from
> g-council or from a WG
> 7. Status update on Working Group survey (see attached
>survey)
> 8. AOB
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|