Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposal for Deferral of Motions

["carlos dionisio aguirre " <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I vote option 2 


Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:04:41 
To: <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>; <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; 
<nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposal for Deferral of Motions



I vote for option 2.
 
j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx





 
 
 
  
----------------
 From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx; 'Julie Hedlund' <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Nathalie 
Peregrine' <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx> 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 6:31 AM
 Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposal for Deferral of Motions 
   
 
 
 
 
SCI colleagues, 
   
This email is in response to the Chairman's request that I prepare a proposal 
for us to 'vote' on to resolve the discussion around deferral of motions. Many 
thanks to Julie Hedlund for her work in preparing this for your review. 
   
As we discussed during our most recent meeting this past Thursday, Aug. 9th, we 
seem to be coalescing around couple of ways to address the issue of deferral of 
motions.  As you may recall, the issue was whether to create a rule in the GNSO 
Council Operating Procedures to limit how many times a motion may be deferred.  
Staff provided statistics from 2010 and 2011 on the number of deferrals.  The 
SCI members seem to agree that the numbers were not high and did not suggest 
abuse.  Conversations on the wiki 
(see https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/Deferral+of+Motions) suggest 
two ways the SCI could recommend that the GNSO Council could address this 
issue: 
   
1.  A light touch approach, i.e. request Staff to monitor deferred motions for 
one year and present the results to the SCI.  At that time, the SCI will once 
again analyze the results, decide whether deferrals are being abused, and 
whether a change to the Procedures is warranted; or  
   
2.  Recommend to the GNSO Council a change to the Procedures that sets a limit 
on the number of deferrals.  The limit would be 1 deferral and the issue that 
was deferred would be the first item on the following GNSO Council agenda. 
   
We would now like to see if we can reach a consensus on one or the other of 
these two recommendations to the GNSO Council on Deferral of Motions.  Please 
indicate on the list your preference for one of these two options (if not in 
agreement, suggest a third option for SCI members to consider). 
   
Thank you for your assistance in helping us move item this to completion. 
   
Kind regards, 
   
RA 
   
 
Ronald N. Andruff 
RNA Partners, Inc. 
    
  
 
 
----------------
 
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathalie Peregrine
 Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:24 AM
 To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
 Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Mp3 and attendance: Standing Committee on 
Improvements Implementation 09 August 2012 
   
Dear All, 
   
The next Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting will take 
place in three weeks' time, on the 30th August 2012. 
   
Please find the Mp3 recording from the SCI call on Thursday, 09 August 2012 at: 
 http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-20120809-en.mp3 on page  
   
Transcript and Mp3 recorded will be posted shortly on: 
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#aug 
   
Attendees  
  
Ray Fassett - Registry Stakeholder Group  - Primary 
Angie Graves - Commercial and Business Users Constituency - Alternate 
J. Scott Evans - Intellectual Property Constituency - Primary  
Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC Alternate 
Ron Andruff - Commercial and Business Users Constituency - Primary 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP - Primary  
James Bladel - Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) - Alternate 
   
Apology: 
   
Avri Doria - Non Commercial SG - Primary  
Mary Wong - Non-Commercial Users Constituency - Primary 
Jonathan Robinson - Registry Stakeholder Group  - Alternate 
Krista Papac - Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) - Primary 
Marika Konings 
   
Staff: 
Julie Hedlund 
Nathalie Peregrine 
   
Please let me know if your name has been left off the list. 
Let me know if you have any questions. 
   
Thank you. 
Kind regards, 
Nathalie Peregrine for 
   
GNSO Secretariat 
gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>  
   
AC Chat transcript 09 August 2012 
   
  Nathalie  Peregrine:SCI meeting - 09 August 2012 
  Julie Hedlund:Hello Nathalie! 
  Ron A:Greetings all! 
  Ron A:Thanks for this, Ray... Amusing that a member of our work team got 
called on that... ;o) 
  Ray Fassett:oops :) 
  Ron A:Apologies for the background noise, unfortunately I cannot escape the 
fact there is another caller close by at this time. 
  Ron A:+1 Julie; no motion needed 
  Ron A:15 - love 
  Ron A:@ Angie: Indeed. This language opens the door... 
  Ron A:@ Julie: that makes sense to me 
  Ron A:Let's take this back to Council 
  Ray Fassett:thanks Wolf 
  Ron A:Thanks all!