<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options
- To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:32:13 -0700
Dear All,
In relation to the agenda item 'Raising an issue - Has this been sufficiently
clarified', three possible approaches were identified during the last meeting:
1. Maintain status quo - which means only the GNSO Council or a group
chartered by the GNSO Council can request an item to be reviewed by the SCI.
Possibly consider communicating to other SO/ACs / individuals, that if there
are issues they would like to see reviewed by the SCI, that they will need to
channel these via the GNSO Council and/or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.
2. Add the possibility for other ICANN SO/ACs to make a direct request to the
SCI – this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would need GNSO
Council approval.
3. Add the possibility for any chartered group to make a direct request to
the SCI – this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would need GNSO
Council approval. Some also noted that a definition of 'chartered' would be
needed as it is not clear whether SO/ACs are chartered.
Members are encouraged to share their views on these three options and/or
identify any other options that should be considered to address this issue
ahead of the next meeting.
With best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|