<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - proposed response deferral of motions
- To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - proposed response deferral of motions
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:59:05 -0700
Dear All,
In relation to the issue of deferral of motions, please find below the latest
version of the proposed response to the GNSO Council for review / approval on
today's SCI meeting.
With best regards,
Marika
Deferral of motions – Proposed Response
The SCI was asked to consider the current GNSO Council informal practice
whereby a party may request the deferral of a motion to a later date in those
situations where a formal process for a deferral is not specifically provided
(for example, certain deferrals are foreseen as part of the GNSO PDP, see
http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16dec11-en.pdf). The SCI
discussed this practice and whether there was a need to create a procedure to
formalize this informal practice. After much debate, the SCI concluded that the
current practice of allowing for the deferral of motions was done as a matter
of courtesy at the discretion of the Chair of the GNSO Council. For this
reason, the SCI concluded that there was no need to create a formal procedure
at this time. However, the SCI felt that it was necessary to explicitly state
that there is no rule that the Chair must always exercise his or her discretion
in the affirmative. Given that the current informal practice is at the
discretion of the Chair, the Chair can exercise that same discretion in
considering whether to grant or deny any request and can also exercise his or
her discretion when determining how to handle any specific situation that may
occur with regard to this informal practice.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|