RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you, Glen.

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

 

  _____  

From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 1:13 PM
To: Ron Andruff; 'Jonathan Robinson'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Neuman, Jeff'
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

 

Dear Jeff,

 

You have been been added to the SCI mailing list
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx with public archives at:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/

 

Thank you.

Kind regards,

 

Glen

 

Glen de Saint Géry 

GNSO Secretariat 

gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

http://gnso.icann.org

 

 

De : owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Ron Andruff
Envoyé : mercredi 2 janvier 2013 18:20
À : 'Jonathan Robinson'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc : 'Neuman, Jeff'
Objet : RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

 

Dear all,

 

First, allow me to wish everyone a healthy, happy and abundant 2013!

 

Jonathan/Jeff: Thank you for bringing this matter to the attention of the
SCI.  To get all of the SCI members up to speed on what is being discussed,
could you kindly provide us with some background information vis-à-vis what
the specific motion was, and what caused it to come back to the Council in
(as I understand it) virtually the same wording?  That will be helpful for
our discussion.

 

Jeff: By way of this email, I am asking staff (pursuant to the SCI Charter)
to add your email address to the discussion list until this matter has been
fully explored and a recommendation has been sent back to Council.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Robinson
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 5:50 AM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Neuman, Jeff'
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

 

All,

 

Jeff Neuman raised a point on the GNSO Council list that the question being
posed to the SCI should be a simpler one focussed on the general principle
not the specific item that caused us to question the principle.  I am in
agreement with this.

 

Therefore my suggestion is that the SCI focus on the essential question i.e.
under what circumstances is it acceptable / permissible for a motion to be
submitted to the GNSO Council when such a motion is identical to one that
has been previously voted down by the Council.

 

Jeff put it well and I am support of his formulation of the question as
follows.

 

The question should simply be "should there be any restrictions on
resubmitting motions that previously appeared before the Council?  If so,
what should those restrictions be and are there any exceptions?

 

Thank-you.

 

 

Jonathan

 

 

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 20 December 2012 18:08
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

 

All,

 

from today's council call the task attached was shifted to the SCI.

Looking forward to meeting you later

Wolf-Ulrich