<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
- To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:12:53 +0200
Hi,
Good point about adding a rate limiting or repeat count requirement.
avri
On 26 May 2013, at 03:51, James M. Bladel wrote:
> Hello SCI Team:
>
> Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder
> Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor
> Option #2.
>
> Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except-
> for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are
> followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some
> limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may
> be re-introduced.
>
> We look forward to further discussions on our next call.
>
> Thanks--
>
> J.
> From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45
> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06
> March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
>
> Dear SCI members,
>
> This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action
> item is as follows:
>
> -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their
> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies.
>
> It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual
> Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other
> representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria.
>
> Best regards,
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
> Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:
>
> 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair
>
> 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
>
> 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no
> later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next
> GNSO Council meeting.
> 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the
> deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council
> meeting.
> 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for
> placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.
> 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken
> off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the
> re-submission.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|