ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion

  • To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:12:53 +0200

Hi,

Good point about adding a rate limiting or repeat count requirement.

avri

On 26 May 2013, at 03:51, James M. Bladel wrote:

> Hello SCI Team:
> 
> Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder 
> Group (RrSG) on this issue.  We can report that RrSG members strongly favor 
> Option #2.
> 
> Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- 
> for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are 
> followed.  Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some 
> limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may 
> be re-introduced.
> 
> We look forward to further discussions on our next call.
> 
> Thanks--
> 
> J.
> From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45
> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 
> March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
> 
> Dear SCI members,
> 
> This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion.  The action 
> item is as follows:
> 
> -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their 
> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. 
> 
> It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual 
> Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group.  All of the other 
> representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria.
> 
> Best regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:
> 
> 1.  Leave up to discretion of the Chair
> 
> 2.  Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
> 
> 1)  Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no 
> later than the deadline for submitting a motion --  8 days prior to  the next 
> GNSO Council meeting.
> 2)  Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the 
> deadline for submitting a motion --  8 days prior to  the next GNSO Council 
> meeting.
> 3)  Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for 
> placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.
> 4)  Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken 
> off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the 
> re-submission.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy