RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

One thought I have is that the work project list must be compared directly to 
the revised draft Charter.

[cid:789255321@05062013-00E9]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 2:45 PM
To: 'Marika Konings'; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Julie Hedlund'; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

Thank you Marika and Julie for these important clarifications.  Indeed, this is 
something that needs serious consideration by all Committee members prior to 
our next meeting.

Thanks also to Mikey for flagging this on our last call, otherwise needed 
consideration may have slipped by us.

I encourage all Committee members to bring their thoughts to the list.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 18:47
To: Ron Andruff; 'Aikman-Scalese, Anne'; Julie Hedlund; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

Maybe I can shed some light as well. The SCI Charter foresees that 'For the 
periodic review of recommendations, the SCI is expected to develop a consistent 
review plan indicating items to be reviewed, proposed timeline as well as 
additional resources needed, if any. This review plan will be submitted to the 
GNSO Council for its information'. This also includes the PDP Manual and 
related Bylaw provisions.  In the PDP-WT Final Report, the WT recommended that 
'the periodic assessment of the overall PDP process is important, noting that a 
certain threshold of completed PDPs should be met before an overall review is 
carried out'. The revised PDP was adopted by the ICANN Board in December 2011. 
It may be worth noting though that, to date, no PDP has been completely run 
under the new rules.

Julie developed the attached list of adopted recommendations and status a while 
back that should give you a better idea which other recommendations currently 
fall under the SCI's remit for periodic review (note, that the status of some 
of these needs to be updated).

Best regards,

Marika

From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday 4 June 2013 23:43
To: "'Aikman-Scalese, Anne'" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

I have to admit, Anne, that this is something that I, too, am unfamiliar with.  
Perhaps Julie can assist us with some institutional memory?

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>

From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, 
Anne
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 17:38
To: 'Ron Andruff'; 'Julie Hedlund'; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June 
2013

Could someone please clarify for me what we are supposed to do in evaluating 
the effectiveness of the changes in By-Laws and Operating Procedures in 
relation to adoption of the PDP Manual?  This strikes me as a very large task 
that someone thinks is "in-scope" and could affect how we treat this Charter 
issue.  Anne

[image001.gif@01CE614B]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:33 PM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June 
2013
Dear all,

I would welcome working through this document online to craft a revised Charter 
that indeed reflects the current SCI mandate.

In that regard, I would also welcome a deeper discussion on the issue that 
Mikey raised on the call, i.e., the substantive change from polishing 
implementation issues from the last GNSO review versus continuing to do this 
work on issues that arise within the Council or from Working Groups.

I understand from the BC and other constituencies, as well as from the GNSO 
Chair, that there is an expectation that the SCI continue to serve but I 
personally am agnostic.  Having said that, those of us who have been on the SCI 
for some time will also recognize that we have been called on to deal with more 
current issues than those that came from implementation.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>

From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 16:16
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June 2013
Importance: High

Dear SCI members,

Attached is the SCI Charter as revised during the SCI meeting on 04 June 2013.  
The changes from today's meeting were grammatical corrections in the General 
and Working Method sections.  The other changes that are redlined and the 
comments are those proposed by the SCI Charter Drafting Team, and the inclusion 
of the Chair and Vice Chair election process as previous discussed and agreed 
to by the SCI.

Please send any comments to the list and this item will be on the agenda for 
the next SCI meeting that will be scheduled in July based on the Doodle poll.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311



Reno (775)823-2900

Tucson (520)622-2090



Albuquerque (505)764-5400

Las Vegas (702)949-8200



Silicon Valley (650)391-1380


  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.



________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.