ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Re-Submitting a Motion

  • To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Re-Submitting a Motion
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:27:36 -0700

Dear SCI members,

Attached for your review is the revised procedure for re-submitting a motion
based on the suggestions from the call on 02 July.  The changes are included
as redlines.  It also is posted to the wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/06+August+2013.  Note that two
of the questions from Marika were addressed, but the remaining question
below and in the attached document needs to be discussed.  Please send your
comments and questions on the list.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Remaining question from Marika:

The PDP Manual foresees that 'In the event that the GNSO Council does not
approve the initiation of the PDP, not including the possible suspension of
further consideration of the Final Issue Report, any Councillor may appeal
the denial, and request that the GNSO Council hold a renewed vote on the
initiation of the PDP at the next subsequent GNSO Council meeting'. There
are no further requirements attached to this 'renewed vote' - would this be
considered an exception or would it need to be brought in line with the new
requirements if/when approved?


Attachment: Re-Submitting Motion 02072013.docx
Description: Microsoft Office

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy