RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Working Group Self-Assessment Test

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Mikey – this makes sense.
Anne

[cid:image001.gif@01CE9745.E3B06950]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700

One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

Map to Parking 
Garage<http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Lewis+and+Roca+Tucson&gl=us&hl=en&sll=32.221762,-110.949424&sspn=0.006295,0.055067&ie=UTF8&view=map&cid=11847041291150279960&hq=lewis+and+roca+tucson&hnear=&ll=32.221951,-110.971892&spn=0.013524,0.019205&t=h&z=16&iwloc=A>

Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>


P

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:04 AM
To: Ron Andruff
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; 'Ken Bour'; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Working Group Self-Assessment Test

i kinda like the idea of approaching the Locking group -- they're definitely a 
bit more done that we are.

m

On Aug 12, 2013, at 10:59 AM, "Ron Andruff" 
<randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


Dear Mikey,

At this point we are waiting on you and Avri to make your decision.  Otherwise, 
if the committee members agree, we could alternatively approach the Locking of 
a Domain Name Working Group.

Mikey? Avri?  Please advise.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>

From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 05:09
To: Mike O'Connor; Ken Bour
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>; 
'Marika Konings'
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Working Group Self-Assessment Test

Another Working Group that has just completed its tasks is the Locking of a 
Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings. Their Final Report was approved by the 
GNSO Council last week. Although the PDP officially got started under the old 
rules, the WG phase itself completely ran under the revised PDP rules.

With best regards,

Marika

From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday 9 August 2013 01:25
To: "ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
Marika Konings <marikakonings@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:marikakonings@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Working Group Self-Assessment Test

i'm game to go ahead w/the Thick Whois WG -- if Avri (fellow member) concurs 
that we're "done enough."

m

On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:54 PM, "Ken Bour" 
<ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



SCI Members:

As your guest consultant on this project, I would like to weigh-in on Mikey’s 
inquiry…

Given that we have made a lot of progress recently and the concepts, rationale, 
design, and questionnaire are fresh on our minds, I recommend that we move to 
the next phase as soon as practicable.

I agree with Mikey’s observation that there is an advantage to being “done” 
with the work plan before undertaking the assessment, but I hope that we do not 
have to postpone forward progress until October-November unless there is no 
other reasonable course of action available.

If the “Thick WHOIS” WG is not quite ready, may I suggest that we identify 
another WG for testing that has recently closed? Perhaps Marika could offer a 
recommendation. It would take me just a few minutes to customize the letter and 
the questionnaire for another team.

Regards,

Ken Bour

From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:56 AM
To: Ron Andruff
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>; 
'Ken Bour'
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Working Group Self-Assessment Test

thanks all,

this looks great.  here's a choice for you.  i could either forward this *now* 
or i could wait until the Thick Whois WG is done (we're likely to wrap up well 
before Argentina).

the advantage of "now" is that we get feedback sooner.

the advantage of "done" is that's when the evaluation fits in the workplan.

i'm very much on the fence.  either way would be fine with me.  Avri, you're in 
that WG.  i'm especially looking to you for preferences/thoughts here.

mikey


On Aug 7, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Ron Andruff 
<randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:




Dear Mikey,

As a member of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI), you 
have been intimately involved in helping develop a new instrument that we are 
calling “Working Group Self-Assessment.” Delving back into the history of the 
GNSO Improvements initiative (2008-2012), it had always been envisioned that 
there would be team member evaluations of Working Group processes; however, no 
prescription for such an instrument had been undertaken until now. The purpose 
of these assessments is to provide Chartering Organizations, such as the GNSO 
Council, important information about how well its Working Groups are 
functioning through an examination of their Inputs -> Processes -> Outputs and 
ultimately leading to continuing process improvements.

As the Chair of the “Thick WHOIS” Working Group, we appreciate your willingness 
to ask your team members if they would help us test the latest version of the 
questionnaire that has been customized at this link: 
http://thickwhois.questionpro.com. All of the background information and 
instructions are contained within the instrument, so there is little more that 
you need to do other than provide an invitation and, say, a 2-3 week timeframe 
to complete it.

Our consultant, Ken Bour, will monitor the completion process, provide status 
updates to the SCI, and be available to provide technical assistance if needed 
by any of your team members.

It would be most helpful if your members would complete the questionnaire as 
though it were a real self-assessment for the “Thick WHOIS” Working Group, 
despite it being a test at this time. That approach will ensure that the 
instrument is thoroughly and exhaustively tested.

How to Provide Further Feedback to the SCI
The questionnaire is designed, of course, to ask about Working Group members’ 
experiences – not the Working Group itself. To provide your team members with a 
place where they can provide feedback about the instrument, we created a 
separate page in the “Thick WHOIS” ICANN Wiki space (Link: 
https://community.icann.org/x/pVZ-Ag) where that type of information can be 
aggregated. We are also set up to accept emails if any of your members would 
prefer that method. Please ask them to submit any feedback to our Consultant on 
this project: Ken Bour at ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>.

In particular, we are interested in learning:
·         Are the questions intelligible and is the wording clear as to intent?
·         Are the design and format straightforward?
·         Does the scaling (1-7) make sense?
·         Are the instructions clear?
·         Is the online presentation (QuestionPro) easy to complete?
·         Can the entire questionnaire be completed within 30 minutes?
·         Are there any important elements of the Working Group’s operations 
that have been neglected?

Thank you in advance for your WG’s involvement in testing this assessment 
instrument.

Ron Andruff, Chair, SCI


Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>



PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)



PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)



PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)




________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.